This strategy has been around for a long time, but I pulled it out again this week. The Anticipation Guide is a strategy that is revisited multiple times during a reading. The first time using this, students identify their opinion on what they think will happen in the chapter by marking "Sí" or "No" in the antes column. There is no right or wrong answer. Discussion can take place as to why they think these events will happen.
Frase del capítulo
|
antes
|
después
|
evidencia
|
El Sr. de Marco trabajaba a la plaza de toros.
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Carmen no habló más con Ana
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Pedro y Ana son novios
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Ana era acostumbrada a todo ahora
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Ana quería ver a Julio Barquero nuevamente
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Ana y Julio estudiaban juntos
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Ana era experta en la Guerra Civil Española
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Julio conoció a unos presidentes, como Washington, Clinton, y Lincoln
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Ana fue a una corrida con Julio.
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
| |
Ana y Julio se casarán
|
Sí No
|
Sí No
|
After doing the first version of the embedded reading, students identify which comment can be verified in the text. Using the después column, students verify with textual evidence what is accurate or what is not. Keep in mind that to make this effective, only reveal a few facts when you choose to what to include in each version. This keeps the students wanting to read more; it keeps the versions novel and interesting. Having them identify textual evidence makes them really interact and read more analytically throughout each version. It also gives them purpose for what they are reading.
What other strategies do you use to engage students with a reading?